Over 58592
politifake

Numbers Politics


OOOPS! BUSTED!! -




LIBTARD FANTASY-LAND VI -




REP DUNCAN HUNTER - Introducing legislation to actually count those who have given up looking for work in the actual unemployment rate. What a concept, counting realistically instead of fudging numbers!




THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE - publishes if the labor pool included the same number of people today that it did when Obama first entered office, the unemployment rate would be over 11 percent, not hovering just above 8 percent.




" A PLAN , A PLAN....MY PRESIDENCY FOR A PLAN " - Looks like he just got his latest rating numbers ?




OBAMA'S SUCCESS... - He has slashed unemployment by persuading millions to give up hope and leave the labor force. What a way to make yourself look good!




PHOTOSHOPPING - Fighting Tyranny, One image at a time!




TWO MORE YEARS - Just keepin it in perspective, Y'all! The nightmare will soon be over.




MOST "ETHICAL LIAR" IN CONGRESS -




OBAMA DANCES IN INDIA - Has he seen his latest poll numbers?




The elephant in the room that the media wants you to ignore -




Obama's War On Prosperity -




The Real Unemployment Numbers -


TAGS: obama unemployment numbers jobs report u6 economic illiterate socialism liberals democrats progressives failed policies recession anemic economic recovery labor force statistics
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 6, 2016, 10:23 pm
It's off how only one of the unemployment numbers is focused on and how the national labor force participation rate are rarely mentioned.


Pathetic Republicans are still coming up with crybaby excuses that this is not the real "Unemployment" numbers. -


TAGS: obama unemployment numbers romney
Rating: 1/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - February 9, 2016, 2:36 am
When I see a flurry of insults over actual arguments, then I know a b***on has been pushed. your "points" are in fact you cherry picking one number out of many, an Ad Hominem, and a Hypothesis Contrary To Fact.
fauxnews - February 7, 2016, 2:21 pm
At least this way I dont have to waste my time on your delusions.Everyone wins! :-D OK,that’s all I got.You can resume talking to yourself Chris(that’s pretty much all you’ve really been doing here,with me anyways.)Have fun Chris :-) Cheers.(5/5)
fauxnews - February 7, 2016, 2:21 pm
And you’re not really responding to me anyways,so why should I do all(or any of)the work?Just cut out the middle man and pretend I said what you wanted me to say,and respond to that,since that’s pretty much all you’re doing anyways.(4/5)
fauxnews - February 7, 2016, 2:20 pm
...then instead how’bout u just pretend I keep saying“See#79037, #79038,#79039,#79040,#79041"every time u whine about me TO ME.Should be easy enough.You’re already stuck in your fantasy world responding 2 your make-believe version of me in your head(3/5)
fauxnews - February 7, 2016, 2:20 pm
But let’s be honest, even simply responding with see #79028 every time is a waste of time. Sooooo….. let’s do this instead: Since you’re stuck in your fantasy world responding to your delusion of me and you’re not really responding to me anyways…(2/5)
fauxnews - February 7, 2016, 2:20 pm
Nope.*sigh* I could be an a-hole and just keep posting "See #79028" which should be a clue to *hint* *hint* "let’s drop this" since you’re never going to actually address my actual points anyways, preferring instead to respond to your strawman of me.(1/5)
calron - February 7, 2016, 1:38 pm
Cause if you say it often enough, it will magically become true. But thanks for the "NO! U!" style response after the dodge.
fauxnews - February 7, 2016, 4:57 am
Once again,when u actually decide 2 actually address my point(s),we can talk.I have no desire to go in circles with u about this,or anything 4 that matter.Waste of time.In fact,just refer 2 this comment for now if u continue in the same vein.You're boring
calron - February 7, 2016, 12:42 am
LoL, irony of your statement is likely lost on you. But nice to see go off topic to dodge the point on top of that.
fauxnews - February 6, 2016, 10:58 pm
Nope, you're making a partisan argument, cherry picking. If Republican adminisrations had these numbers, they'd be bragging. Not great but still very good.
calron - February 6, 2016, 10:27 pm
https://fortunedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/employment-population.jpg?quality=80
calron - February 6, 2016, 10:27 pm
That number doesn't count long term unemployment so it doesn't count those out of work to long. Try looking at all 6 unemployment numbers and the nation labor force participation rate together to get an idea of actual unemployment.


PREV PAGE